Crystallography and Computational Quantum Mechanics Part IV: Rotational Symmetry
In previous talks we showed that lattices have translational symmetry: a three-dimensional lattice is defined by the primitive vectors, a1, a2, and a3 which determine the periodicity of the lattice. If we have an atom at any point R in space, then an identical atom is at the point
A lattice, along with its accompanying "basis can have many other symmetries. We briefly touched on rotational symmetry in our discussion of crystal systems, and we have talked about the screw axis, a combination of rotational and translational symmetry. Both operations, as well as mirror planes and glide planes, result in a crystal structure which is identical to the original structure.
In this tutorial we will discuss allowed rotations in a crystal structure (or lattice). It turns out that only rotations of certain angles, specified by the Crystallographic Restriction Theorem, are allowed. In and two and three dimensions these angles are 30°, 60°, 90°, 120° and 180°. We have discussed rotational symmetry in conjunction with two-dimensional systems, but here we will generalize to three dimensions. Fortunately our drawing skills will not be taxed very much, as rotation in three dimensions takes place in a plane perpendicular to an axis. As a result, most of the drawings shown below will be two dimensional, you'll have to imagine the axis pointing out of the page or screen.
Simply put, an object has rotational symmetry if a rotation does not change its appearance. A simple example is shown in Fig. 1. If your browser works correctly, the square will eventually rotate by 90° and stop before starting again. If you look away from the picture for 15-20 seconds and then look back, you can not tell if the rotation happened or not. The square is invariant to a rotation of 90°. Since four such rotations bring it back to its original position, this is a 4-fold rotation, and the axis is called a 4-fold axis.
This works with real atoms as well. Fig. 2 shows an a view of a cesium chloride crystal looking down a Cartesian axis. If we rotate the picture by 90° around the central cesium atom (sorry, no animation this time) we get an image that looks exactly the same. What's more, if we re-centered the picture on one of the other atoms and did the rotation we'd still get exactly the same picture. Cesium chloride has a bunch of 4-fold rotation axes.
Of course not every rotation is invariant – if you rotate either Fig. 1 or Fig. 2 by, say, 57.3°, you won't see an identical picture. In two- and three- dimensional periodic crystals there are only a few rotations that can yield a crystal structure with rotational symmetry: 180°, 120°, 90° and 60°, or 2-fold, 3-fold, 4-fold and 6-fold rotations. You might think there could be a 72° (5-fold) rotation axis, but that's forbidden by the Crystallographic Restriction Theorem, which is a subject for another time.
Not all crystal structures have rotational symmetry, and not all rotations are allowed for everywhere – for example, only hexagonal crystals can have a 6-fold rotation axis, and only tetragonal and cubic crystals can have a 4-fold rotational axis.
What's more, not all crystals in a given crystal system have all the rotations allowed by that system. As an example see PrRu4P12. It is cubic, like cesium chloride, but it does not have a 4-fold rotation axis.
In the following we'll look at the allowed rotations and note the crystal classes where they can appear.
A 2-fold rotation is a rotation of 180° around one axis – called that because making two rotations takes you back to the original structure. These rotations can occur any crystal system except triclinic. Fig. 3 shows a projection of either an orthorhombic crystal looking down a Cartesian axis or a tetragonal crystal looking down the a- or b- axis. Rotating by 180° results in a structure indistinguishable from the original.
What may not be so obvious is that there is another 2-fold axis in this picture. Fig. 4 shows another view of the same structure, but doubled unit cell in the a-c plane. Here we can see that there is a 2-fold axis at the point of the central lithium atom (but not the other Li atom, nor the tin atoms). This multiplicity occurs in many crystals.
Those aren't the only two rotation axes in this picture. Fig. 5 shows the even more 2-fold rotation axes in this structure. The vaguely football-shaped marker is the symbol for a 2-fold rotation axis. Many crystals have a large number of rotation axes. We won't point them all out, but you should be aware they are present. Standard crystallography resources have diagrams showing all possible rotation axes (and much more) in every space group.
A three-fold rotation axis requires three 120° rotations to return to the original orientation, but you wouldn't notice it because an object with a 3-fold axis looks exactly the same after one rotation as it does with 2, 3, 4, or however many. The trigonal and cubic crystal systems have 3-fold rotation axes.†
Let's start with the 3-fold axis. Fig. 6 shows several Wigner-Seitz cells for a hexagonal lattice with a basis that gives it trigonal symmetry,‡ shown looking down the rotational axis.
There are two 3-fold axis in a hexagonal (or rhombohedral) lattice: at the center of the conventional Wigner-Seitz cell and at the three-cornered boundaries between the cells. Unlike the 2-fold axis there aren't multiple centers. We should use a triangle to denote the rotation axes, but since we already used the triangle to mark the “atom” positions we won't bother here. Just remember that space group diagrams use triangles to mark 3-fold axes.
A cubic lattice has a three-fold axis along the body diagonal ([111] axis) of the conventional unit cell, even if the actual lattice is body-centered or face-centered. The left half of Fig. 7 shows a view of the cubic “A15” structure, Cr3Si, looking down that axis. The 3-fold rotation symmetry is obvious.
Four-fold rotation axes can only occur in the tetragonal and cubic crystal systems. Fig. 8 shows an example system. It could be a tetragonal crystal, looking down the z- ([001]) axis of the conventional tetragonal cell, or a cubic crystal, looking down the x-, y-, or z-axis ([100], [010], or [001], respectively) of the conventional cubic cell. The figure shows two 4-fold axes, indicated by black diamonds: one axis is at the center of a unit cell, and one on the corner between four cells.
This particular cubic system also has a number of 2-fold axes, as shown in Fig. 9.
The cubic crystal system is defined by 3-fold rotation and a 4-fold rotation. We might expect that this requires Cr3Si to have a 4-fold axis, but it does not. As seen on the right side of Fig. 7, which looks down the [100] axis, Cr3Si has a 2-fold rotation axis, but not a 4-fold one. This is actually the minimal requirement for a cubic crystal: all cubic crystals have a 2-fold axis along the [100] directions, and a 3-fold axis along the [111] directions. The cubic system has the maximal rotational symmetry of a cubic lattice, which includes 4-fold rotations along the [100] directions.
Logically we should have a 5-fold, or pentagonal, rotational symmetry. In that case the Wigner-Seitz cell for the conventional pentagonal lattice would look like Fig. 10:
Unfortunately, the Crystallographic Restriction Theorem (CRT) prohibits this rotational lattice in a periodic crystal. In fact, in two and three dimensions only 2-, 3-, 4- and 6-fold rotations are allowed. The CRT article will discuss seeming exceptions to this rule. For periodic systems, however,
Six-fold, or 60° rotations, are permitted symmetries in two and three dimensions. These rotations can only occur in the hexagonal crystal system, with a hexagonal lattice. In fact, the existence of a 6-fold rotation axis defines the hexagonal crystal system, which is otherwise trigonal with a 3-fold axis. Of course a hexagonal crystal does have a 120° rotational symmetry, but that's a combination of two 60° rotations.
In fact there are two 6-fold axes in a hexagonal crystal: one at the center of the Wigner-Seitz cell, and one at the three-cell junctions between the cells, as shown in Fig. 12.
This all comes with a caveat. Figures 1-8 and 10 show well ordered, well behaved crystals. This would seem to be the default. Every crystal in the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD) and the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD) has a well-defined unit cell. There may be some uncertainty about which kind of atom occupies a particular site, but in general everything forms a nice, periodic crystal.
In reality this is not the case. In fact, we are compelled to issue a warning:
Real “crystals” have many imperfections. Fig. 14 looks much like Fig. 3, but
All of these defects destroy the periodicity of the crystal. So why do we see “ordered” crystals? We see them because these defects are local: averaged over many, many cells, the entire crystal looks periodic.
That's the end of our brief review of possible rotational symmetries in crystals. The important conclusions are:
Here is a brief definition of some of the terms used in this article:
† Technically the hexagonal crystal system has a 3-fold axis as well, but it's a combination of two 60° (6-fold axis) rotations, so we won't count it.
‡ As we've established in Part II and Part IV, a hexagonal lattice can have either trigonal (3-fold axis) or hexagonal (6-fold axis) symmetry, depending on the basis. Here the basis (two sets of triangles) is chosen to give trigonal symmetry.